Check the activity network
Review relationship gaps, unusual leads or lags, constraints, and activities without clear predecessors or successors. An incomplete network can create misleading float or critical path results.
A CPM schedule should be reviewed for technical quality as well as its reported finish date. CPMForge provides one-click schedule QA/QC and review reporting tools designed for people preparing and evaluating construction schedules.
Review relationship gaps, unusual leads or lags, constraints, and activities without clear predecessors or successors. An incomplete network can create misleading float or critical path results.
Look for potentially excessive float, unusually long durations, inconsistent calendars and milestone sequencing. A check identifies items that require engineering judgment; it does not establish that each item is automatically wrong.
CPMForge's source homepage describes a review comments workbook, activity-level findings and a schedule narrative. Use those outputs to communicate observations, obtain contractor responses and preserve the review record.
The product homepage references DCMA 14-point checks within its schedule verification features. The appropriate acceptance criteria still depend on the project contract, specifications and agency requirements.
No. Automated findings support a review; contract requirements and professional judgment determine acceptability.
Typical categories include missing logic, lags, constraints, durations, float, critical path continuity and calendar assumptions.
The provided CPMForge homepage describes one-click schedule narratives and an Excel review comments workbook.
CPMForge supports software-assisted review. Always compare the results against applicable contract documents and project requirements.